Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delete unreachable default clauses. #561

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2024

Conversation

stereotype441
Copy link
Contributor

The Dart analyzer will soon be changed so that if the default clause of a switch statement is determined to be unreachable by the exhaustiveness checker, a new warning of type
unreachable_switch_default will be issued. This parallels the behavior of the existing unreachable_switch_case warning, which is issued whenever a case clause of a switch statement is determined to be unreachable. For details see
dart-lang/sdk#54575.

This PR deletes unreachable default clauses from photo_view now, to avoid a spurious warning when the analyzer change lands.

The Dart analyzer will soon be changed so that if the `default` clause
of a `switch` statement is determined to be unreachable by the
exhaustiveness checker, a new warning of type
`unreachable_switch_default` will be issued. This parallels the
behavior of the existing `unreachable_switch_case` warning, which is
issued whenever a `case` clause of a `switch` statement is determined
to be unreachable. For details see
dart-lang/sdk#54575.

This PR deletes unreachable `default` clauses from `photo_view` now,
to avoid a spurious warning when the analyzer change lands.
Copy link
Member

@spydon spydon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm!
Ping @renancaraujo

@renancaraujo renancaraujo merged commit a13ca2f into bluefireteam:main Sep 4, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants