Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(vald): extend type API to reduce underlying ambiguity #2190

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 2, 2024

Conversation

kyanokashi
Copy link
Member

@kyanokashi kyanokashi commented Oct 1, 2024

Description

Todos

  • Unit tests
  • Manual tests
  • Documentation
  • Connect epics/issues
  • Tag type of change
  • Upgrade handler

Steps to Test

Expected Behaviour

Other Notes

@kyanokashi kyanokashi requested a review from a team as a code owner October 1, 2024 20:26
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 39.83%. Comparing base (29bb3e9) to head (06711b7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2190      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   39.83%   39.83%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         373      373              
  Lines       30855    30857       +2     
==========================================
- Hits        12292    12291       -1     
- Misses      17638    17642       +4     
+ Partials      925      924       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@milapsheth milapsheth changed the title fix(vald-evm): extend type API to reduce underlying ambiguity fix(vald): extend type API to reduce underlying ambiguity Oct 2, 2024
@milapsheth milapsheth merged commit 6271ef5 into main Oct 2, 2024
9 checks passed
@milapsheth milapsheth deleted the fix/vald-evm/reduce-type-ambiguity branch October 2, 2024 19:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants