-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(uat): implement T17 and T18 scenario outlines #348
Merged
MikeDombo
merged 19 commits into
uat-dev
from
GGMQ-199-implement-ggmq-scenario-based-on-ggad-1-t-17-ggad-1-t-18
Jul 21, 2023
Merged
feat(uat): implement T17 and T18 scenario outlines #348
MikeDombo
merged 19 commits into
uat-dev
from
GGMQ-199-implement-ggmq-scenario-based-on-ggad-1-t-17-ggad-1-t-18
Jul 21, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bgklika
force-pushed
the
GGMQ-199-implement-ggmq-scenario-based-on-ggad-1-t-17-ggad-1-t-18
branch
from
June 28, 2023 17:30
66d5fc4
to
bd9ff12
Compare
Unit Tests Coverage Report
Minimum allowed coverage is Generated by 🐒 cobertura-action against 75a4014 |
bgklika
changed the title
feat(uat): implement GGMQ-1-T18 scenario outline
feat(uat): implement T17 and T18 scenario outlines
Jun 30, 2023
MikeDombo
reviewed
Jul 3, 2023
uat/testing-features/src/main/java/com/aws/greengrass/platforms/linux/NetworkUtilsLinux.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
uat/testing-features/src/main/java/com/aws/greengrass/platforms/linux/NetworkUtilsLinux.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
bgklika
force-pushed
the
GGMQ-199-implement-ggmq-scenario-based-on-ggad-1-t-17-ggad-1-t-18
branch
from
July 3, 2023 14:17
4c0d552
to
a4ed4d5
Compare
PR moved to Draft due to pending for changes from aws-greengrass/aws-greengrass-testing#211 should be delivered first. |
bgklika
force-pushed
the
GGMQ-199-implement-ggmq-scenario-based-on-ggad-1-t-17-ggad-1-t-18
branch
from
July 5, 2023 16:44
a4ed4d5
to
60fcb07
Compare
MikeDombo
reviewed
Jul 5, 2023
uat/testing-features/src/main/java/com/aws/greengrass/steps/NetworkUtilsSteps.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
bgklika
force-pushed
the
GGMQ-199-implement-ggmq-scenario-based-on-ggad-1-t-17-ggad-1-t-18
branch
from
July 7, 2023 15:18
60fcb07
to
4a91e0c
Compare
MikeDombo
reviewed
Jul 10, 2023
...atures/src/main/resources/local-store/artifacts/aws.greengrass.clientdevices.mqtt.Bridge.jar
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
bgklika
force-pushed
the
GGMQ-199-implement-ggmq-scenario-based-on-ggad-1-t-17-ggad-1-t-18
branch
from
July 10, 2023 16:33
4a91e0c
to
b858dc8
Compare
bgklika
force-pushed
the
GGMQ-199-implement-ggmq-scenario-based-on-ggad-1-t-17-ggad-1-t-18
branch
2 times, most recently
from
July 19, 2023 18:20
cf8844c
to
d9fb3c7
Compare
MikeDombo
previously approved these changes
Jul 19, 2023
OTF tests seem maybe stuck? It has been running nearly 3 hours now. |
Locally it extend 3 hours. On CodeBuild should run faster but now we have a lot of scenarios to run. |
3h 41m 3s |
…uraion update step
bgklika
force-pushed
the
GGMQ-199-implement-ggmq-scenario-based-on-ggad-1-t-17-ggad-1-t-18
branch
from
July 21, 2023 17:19
d9fb3c7
to
75a4014
Compare
MikeDombo
approved these changes
Jul 21, 2023
MikeDombo
deleted the
GGMQ-199-implement-ggmq-scenario-based-on-ggad-1-t-17-ggad-1-t-18
branch
July 21, 2023 21:07
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue #, if available:
Implement GGMQ scenario based on GGAD-1-T17, GGAD-1-T18
Description of changes:
Why is this change necessary:
Make replacement of GGAD-1-T17 and GGAD-1-T18
How was this change tested:
Run scenario on CodeBuild
Test results:
T18 (Now clients reduced to only sdk-java)
T17:
Any additional information or context required to review the change:
These scenario outlines failed on Windows due to bug in OTF/Nucleus described here and tagged with @SkipOnWindows
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.