Ydrea

[ydrea]

brief description of changes

I added some warnings, notes and links between chapters

further comments

Issues I ran into while cloning a 6.2.3 instance.

---

This box must be checked

• [*] the PR branch was originally made from the base branch

This box should be checked

• [*] after these changes the docs build locally without error

This box should only be checked you intend to follow through on it (we can do it on our end too)

• [*] I will cherry-pick all commits in this PR into other branches that should have them after this PR is merged

[chiatt]

Hi @ydrea thanks for this PR. Given the large number of commits and files changed, I suspect you didn't make your changes to a fork of master. That's not a problem as long as we know what branch you used. Do you recall which one it was?

[ydrea]

yes, 6.2 that is the version I have been working on

…

On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 at 15:38, Cyrus Hiatt ***@***.***> wrote: Hi @ydrea <https://github.com/ydrea> thanks for this PR. Given the large number of commits and files changed, I suspect you didn't make your changes to a fork of master. That's not a problem as long as we know what branch you used. Do you recall which one it was? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#351 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANHYNGX5SDIFNPAX2F3Z4Q3XPKX6XANCNFSM6AAAAAA2CE3H2I> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[ekansa]

@ydrea I just returned from Europe so I'm sorry for the few days of lag in my response.

I just modified your PR so that it would merge into the 6.2 branch of this repo (https://github.com/archesproject/arches-docs/tree/6.2). It'll make it much easier to review and incorporate your enhancement.

@chiatt I see you commented here and were a suggested reviewer. But when I changed the base branch, it looks like my change removed the suggested reviewers! @ydrea if you could add suggested reviews again?

Thanks for your patience!