Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add mentions of TurboWarp (part 1) #293

Draft
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Add mentions of TurboWarp (part 1) #293

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

Hans5958
Copy link
Member

@Hans5958 Hans5958 commented Jan 14, 2023

Related (not resolved): #167

Up for grabs. For now, it just consists of two paragraphs. I was planning to add images, at least TW logo, but not sure if it is needed.

@Hans5958 Hans5958 added type: enhancement New feature or request scope: docs Related to the documentation (Scratch Addons Docs) labels Jan 14, 2023
@WorldLanguages
Copy link
Member

You could add 1 screenshot, I think. But it's not necessary.

@WorldLanguages
Copy link
Member

Is this how it's supposed to look?
image

@Hans5958
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, for now. I have to add something on inside there (including, well, the link to TurboWarp), but that's for later.

@Samq64
Copy link
Member

Samq64 commented Mar 12, 2023

Maybe a button like the ones for the extension stores would be better?

@Secret-chest
Copy link
Contributor

Should it be presented as "official", like it is now?

@WorldLanguages
Copy link
Member

Should it be presented as "official", like it is now?

Would you say it's presented as "official" in the current version of this PR? Why?

@Hans5958
Copy link
Member Author

Maybe a button like the ones for the extension stores would be better?

Yes, that's what I'm thinking. I just quite busy doing other things.

@WorldLanguages
Copy link
Member

We could also link to Adacraft (just an idea - not saying I support it)

@WorldLanguages
Copy link
Member

I also think "try some of the editor addons on TurboWarp before installing" could be rephrased to acknowledge that some users have stopped using the vanilla Scratch editor at all. So, for that portion of users, we aren't trying to convince to download the extension. Instead, we're making them aware that the addons they are using in those editors come from this open source project. What do you think?

@Hans5958
Copy link
Member Author

Hans5958 commented Mar 13, 2023

We could also link to Adacraft (just an idea - not saying I support it)

If there are more than two Scratch editor forks/mods then I think it is better to generalize it a bit, like "some implement the addons, one popular example of TurboWarp, but here are the list of other choices"

I also think "try some of the editor addons on TurboWarp before installing" could be rephrased to acknowledge that some users have stopped using the vanilla Scratch editor at all. [...]

We could do that, but I want to emphasize the "try" part more that the "offline client" part, but that's just me. I also want you to mind the docs portion. The paragraph of "Since TurboWarp also offers a desktop client, ..." can be improved into something. We can also generalize just like how we generalize what Scratch forks can be used as said before.

@WorldLanguages
Copy link
Member

If there are more than two Scratch editor forks/mods then I think it is better to generalize it a bit, like "some implement the addons, one popular example of TurboWarp, but here are the list of other choices"

I think I agree, but it's hard to say without judging a final layout/paragraph.

We could do that, but I want to emphasize the "try" part more that the "offline client" part, but that's just me.

I wasn't exactly referring to the offline clients. What do you mean here?

I also want you to mind the docs portion. The paragraph of "Since TurboWarp also offers a desktop client, ..." can be improved into something.

What information do you think could be added there?

@Secret-chest
Copy link
Contributor

Secret-chest commented Apr 4, 2023

"Other Scratch mods can include our addons as well. TurboWarp does this."
"You can try our addons online on TurboWarp, or download its offline editor with our addons."

@Hans5958
Copy link
Member Author

Hans5958 commented Apr 4, 2023

I wasn't exactly referring to the offline clients. What do you mean here?

On the index page, you were trying to make it so they became "aware that the addons they are using in those editors come from [other] open source project[s]". For the page, I want to focus where people can try it before installing the extension, similar to how some programming languages have a "playground" or "REPL" or whatever the lingo is.

@WorldLanguages
Copy link
Member

@Hans5958 Sounds good to me

@Hans5958
Copy link
Member Author

Hans5958 commented Aug 26, 2023

Was trying to do this on the new index (#327), and one problem I realise is that linking to https://turbowarp.org/addons doesn't have any linkback to the initial TurboWarp editor. Linking to https://turbowarp.org/editor would be the alternative, but it's better that we can direct the user that "look at that Addons button on the navbar, you should click it," but that would need changes on the other side.

image

@Hans5958 Hans5958 force-pushed the turbowarp branch 2 times, most recently from 0420c35 to 07a2e8a Compare August 27, 2023 05:38
@Samq64
Copy link
Member

Samq64 commented Aug 27, 2023

Should the Scratch font T be used?

@Hans5958
Copy link
Member Author

Hans5958 commented Aug 27, 2023

Ah, forgot to tell you that one.

I seem to can't find the SVG version of the TurboWarp logo, so that is the placeholder. If anyone can find it, I would appreciate it.

@mxmou
Copy link
Member

mxmou commented Aug 27, 2023

Ah, forgot to tell you that one.

I seem to can't find the SVG version of the TurboWarp logo, so that is the placeholder. If anyone can find it, I would appreciate it.

The turbowarp-player addon uses a SVG icon.

@Hans5958 Hans5958 force-pushed the turbowarp branch 3 times, most recently from b62dd85 to 8d2ad0d Compare August 27, 2023 12:31
@Hans5958
Copy link
Member Author

Hans5958 commented Aug 27, 2023

Got it. Thank you!

image

@Hans5958 Hans5958 changed the title Add mentions of TurboWarp (part 1?) Add mentions of TurboWarp (part 1) Aug 27, 2023
@Samq64
Copy link
Member

Samq64 commented Aug 27, 2023

Should it be monochrome like the others?

@Hans5958
Copy link
Member Author

I suck at Inkscape, unfortunately. Would it be possible for you to create one of it?

@WorldLanguages
Copy link
Member

Linking to https://turbowarp.org/editor would be the alternative, but it's better that we can direct the user that "look at that Addons button on the navbar, you should click it," but that would need changes on the other side.

image

@Samq64
Copy link
Member

Samq64 commented Aug 27, 2023

I suck at Inkscape, unfortunately. Would it be possible for you to create one of it?

It's giving me trouble because the outer T the same but with a thinker border.

@WorldLanguages
Copy link
Member

image

I think we should remove the TurboWarp screenshot, it removes too much attention from the install call-to-action buttons.

@Hans5958
Copy link
Member Author

I think we should remove the TurboWarp screenshot, it removes too much attention from the install call-to-action button

I want to balance the contents of the left Install section and the right Try section. I may reconsider this, but just wanted let you know if you had other ideas.

@Samq64
Copy link
Member

Samq64 commented Aug 28, 2023

I think we should remove the TurboWarp screenshot, it removes too much attention from the install call-to-action button

I want to balance the contents of the left Install section and the right Try section. I may reconsider this, but just wanted let you know if you had other ideas.

Maybe the user count could be centered? Or would that be confusing since it would also be under TurboWarp?

@WorldLanguages
Copy link
Member

WorldLanguages commented Aug 28, 2023

I want to balance the contents of the left Install section and the right Try section. I may reconsider this, but just wanted let you know if you had other ideas.

I'm not sure if I have other ideas

Or would that be confusing since it would also be under TurboWarp?

Yeah, it would be confusing, but maybe the user count could be moved somewhere else

@mxmou
Copy link
Member

mxmou commented Aug 28, 2023

I suck at Inkscape, unfortunately. Would it be possible for you to create one of it?

It's giving me trouble because the outer T the same but with a thinker border.

<svg viewBox="0 0 135.467 135.467" height="512" width="512" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g font-weight="400" font-family="sans-serif" letter-spacing="0" word-spacing="0"><path style="color:#000;fill:#fff;-inkscape-stroke:none" d="M98.192 1.204c-6.807.238-13.357 2.614-20.218 2.481-14.303.854-28.734.32-42.974.24-4.323-1.562-14.692 2.28-19.632 7.582-5.757 5.099-9.88 12.67-9.528 20.563-.585 2.59 2.655 10.996 2.145 9.186-3.048-6.151 2.036 4.726 1.333 6.589 1.045 12.599 4.386 27.163 16.26 33.89 3.327 1.708 11.174 3.291 4.647 7.217-6.228 9.08-5.964 21.685-1.254 31.34 6.966 11.962 22.255 15.536 35.143 13.595 7.323-1.644 14.712.557 21.999-.656 13.332-2.59 23.288-15.291 24.642-28.482.631-10.279-4.837-20.888-13.792-26.065 6.633-2.66 14.894-1.309 20.18-7.177 8.356-6.768 12.36-18.328 10.332-28.845 3.108-12.223.028-26.451-9.704-34.907-5.402-4.44-12.697-6.299-19.58-6.55Zm.112 12.491c8.845-.353 17.259 6.611 17.937 15.571-.26 7.166-1.9 14.2-.83 21.383-.87 9.122-10.128 16.217-19.188 14.284-4.79.366-10.896-6.132-12.154-6.71.528 9.713.301 19.443.38 29.164 11.59.787 17.88 16.23 10.979 25.284-3.968 7.175-13.046 9.719-20.683 8.02-10.39-.196-21.993 3.855-31.307-2.625-9.633-6.816-7.06-24.464 4.687-27.419 7.071-3.368 1.836-12.848 3.388-19.044-.257-6.483-6.262 3.321-10.588 1.53-7.526.691-14.583-4.652-16.424-11.9-2.849-8.363-2.462-17.443-5.32-25.804-1.58-10.348 8.274-20.262 18.63-18.96 14.84.14 29.724.575 44.542-.51 5.395-.261 10.644-1.653 15.95-2.264zM8.602 42.684l.14.316Zm50.8 45.835-.076.04zm25.047 7.218.017.74z"/><path d="M103.81 31.766q-1.056 4.619-1.584 10.029-.132 1.451.264 3.694.396 2.64.396 3.695 0 3.43-4.487 3.43-2.903 0-3.826-1.715-.132-2.903.131-7.917.264-5.938.264-7.917-.132 0-.395-.264-12.272.528-23.092 1.584-.264 1.715 0 4.222l.528 4.75q-.528 4.09-.528 12.14.396 3.43.396 29.425v9.633q0 2.243.66 3.167h8.18q5.015-.66 5.015 4.222 0 2.903-2.771 4.09-1.716.66-6.07.265-2.64-.264-6.202-.132-4.882.66-11.876 1.055-7.125.396-8.708-1.979-1.056-1.583 0-3.299 1.847-2.903 9.632-2.903 4.09 0 4.09-2.243 0-1.187-.131-2.243 0-3.299.132-5.806.395-7.125 0-20.057-.528-18.737.395-33.648l-.395-.395q-4.09.263-15.307-.132-.528 0-8.049.527 1.847 12.668 2.111 18.078l-.264 3.563q-.132 1.979-3.298 1.979-2.508 0-4.223-9.5-.792-5.675-1.583-11.48 0-.924-.924-3.167-.792-2.376-.792-3.563 0-3.299 5.014-4.09.396 0 1.32.131.924.132 1.32.132h32.723q12.14-.528 23.488-2.111.792-.396 2.375-.792 2.771-.264 4.75 1.32 1.98 1.451 1.32 4.222z" font-size="148.867" fill="#fff" style="line-height:1.25"/></g></svg>

@WorldLanguages
Copy link
Member

Thanks Garbo for approving the mention!

Looks like the TW icon is invisible in dark mode, because the button is white.

@WorldLanguages
Copy link
Member

I want to balance the contents of the left Install section and the right Try section. I may reconsider this, but just wanted let you know if you had other ideas.

I'm not sure if I have other ideas

Maybe the "try turbowarp" section should be below install and user count (maybe in the future we can move the user count somewhere else too)

@Hans5958 Hans5958 added the scope: content Related to the contents of the website, excluding blog and docs label Aug 31, 2023
@Hans5958
Copy link
Member Author

Hans5958 commented Sep 3, 2023

Maybe the user count could be centered? Or would that be confusing since it would also be under TurboWarp?

This is actually one of the ideas before having the extension image instead.

image

Yeah, it would be confusing, but maybe the user count could be moved somewhere else

Or we could drop the user count altogether (hehe)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
scope: content Related to the contents of the website, excluding blog and docs scope: docs Related to the documentation (Scratch Addons Docs) type: enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: In Progress
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants