Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NoSQL vs RDBMS backend?? #1

Open
atulsaurav opened this issue Jul 29, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

NoSQL vs RDBMS backend?? #1

atulsaurav opened this issue Jul 29, 2017 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@atulsaurav
Copy link

Since we are on AWS, why don't we use a simple NoSQL data store like DynamoDB vs our current plan of RDS?

It will simplify lots of scenarios.

@skvasant
Copy link
Contributor

Gr8 idea @atulsaurav except we have like another 6hrs before showing something works, therefore lets leave this as a suggestion for now ;)

@djfurman
Copy link
Member

Here's a thought...

  • RDS for Static Content
  • ElasticCache/Redis for Caching Content
  • DynamoDB for final wishes
  • Lambda for BE processing
  • API gateway for Lambda Invokation
  • Cognito for user authentication
  • S3 for static hosting (consider CloudFront)
  • Route53 for DNS
  • Azure Face for Facial Recognition
  • Glacier for Long Term Photo storage

@djfurman
Copy link
Member

Yay serverless!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants