Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable USE_UMFPACK in surface module on macOS CI #6078

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cybaol
Copy link
Contributor

@cybaol cybaol commented Jul 8, 2024

No description provided.

@cybaol cybaol force-pushed the enable-USE_UMFPACK-on-macos-ci branch from 964462d to bdc9ab5 Compare July 19, 2024 23:44
@@ -293,6 +293,13 @@ endif()
# OpenMP (optional)
option(WITH_OPENMP "Build with parallelization using OpenMP" TRUE)
if(WITH_OPENMP)
if(APPLE)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you remove this change from this PR?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this is removed, SuiteSparse can't find OpenMP, and I've moved this to #6114 , but there are still some issues and details to be discussed. Merge this after the #6114 merge?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What if you try remove the local findOpenMP and use the one from Cmake itself, as in #6100?

else
leaf_count += node->m_count;
}
// static void NodeCountHelper( const ON_RTreeNode* node, std::size_t& node_count, std::size_t& wasted_branch_count, std::size_t& leaf_count )
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lets just remove this, if you think its not of use?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Of course

@larshg
Copy link
Contributor

larshg commented Aug 27, 2024

Since it only touches 3. party On nurbs, I think its fine to merge (our CI's is green) - what do you thing @mvieth ?
But I won't be able to review in detail.

@cybaol Do you have any benchmarks for how much its improved?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants