Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Template rust keywords 3195 v5 #11932

Closed

Conversation

catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

Link to ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/3195 (generic)

Describe changes:

  • template: move keywords to rust

#11911 with needed rebase after merge of #11916

Ticket: 3195

Also remove unused src/tests/detect-template-buffer.c

Completes commit 4a7567b
to remove references to template-rust
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 10, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.82540% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.76%. Comparing base (58556b7) to head (4ec82a1).
Report is 13 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #11932      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.74%   82.76%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         912      912              
  Lines      249102   249057      -45     
==========================================
+ Hits       206117   206123       +6     
+ Misses      42985    42934      -51     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 60.72% <44.44%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
livemode 18.72% <7.93%> (-0.14%) ⬇️
pcap 43.64% <7.93%> (-0.47%) ⬇️
suricata-verify 62.17% <96.82%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
unittests 59.00% <7.93%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@suricata-qa
Copy link

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline 23082

@victorjulien victorjulien added this to the 8.0 milestone Oct 12, 2024
@victorjulien
Copy link
Member

Merged in #11948, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants