Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

python312Packages.pymumble: 1.6.1 -> unstable-2024-10-2 #350131

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tjni
Copy link
Contributor

@tjni tjni commented Oct 21, 2024

Move to using my fork of pymumble with a commit that regenerates proto files using protoc 3.20 and relaxes version constraints.

Original upstream has declared in their README that they are no longer maintaining the project, so I created a fork instead of submitting a PR.

I'm not an active user of this package but invested in keeping packages building if they take minimal effort. In this case, it currently just requires regenerating the mumble_pb2.py file.

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

Move to using my fork of pymumble with a commit that regenerates proto
files using protoc 3.20 and relaxes version constraints.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant