Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Refactor Cloud Template import image for COS sources #1223

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jaywcarman
Copy link
Member

@jaywcarman jaywcarman commented May 3, 2023

Depends on:

Related to:

Refactor the parameter validation and implicit auth checks via
'resource_search' calls to allow for both Cloud Manager templates
(existing functionality) and Storage Manager object storage objects
(newly added functionality).

After validation the 'data' still gets passed directly to the
import_image_queue class method of the destination provider.
@jaywcarman jaywcarman force-pushed the powervs_import_image_from_cos_cloud_templates_controller_import_image branch from 56099e3 to 686b593 Compare May 3, 2023 20:59
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented May 3, 2023

Checked commit jaywcarman@686b593 with ruby 2.6.10, rubocop 1.28.2, haml-lint 0.35.0, and yamllint
1 file checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 🍪

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Aug 21, 2023

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If these changes are still valid, please remove the stale label, make any changes requested by reviewers (if any), and ensure that this issue is being looked at by the assigned/reviewer(s)

Thank you for all your contributions! More information about the ManageIQ triage process can be found in the triage process documentation.

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Nov 27, 2023

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If these changes are still valid, please remove the stale label, make any changes requested by reviewers (if any), and ensure that this issue is being looked at by the assigned/reviewer(s).

3 similar comments
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Mar 4, 2024

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If these changes are still valid, please remove the stale label, make any changes requested by reviewers (if any), and ensure that this issue is being looked at by the assigned/reviewer(s).

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Jun 10, 2024

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If these changes are still valid, please remove the stale label, make any changes requested by reviewers (if any), and ensure that this issue is being looked at by the assigned/reviewer(s).

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Sep 16, 2024

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If these changes are still valid, please remove the stale label, make any changes requested by reviewers (if any), and ensure that this issue is being looked at by the assigned/reviewer(s).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants