-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 302
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add capability to write signal with unique samps_per_frame
to wfdb.io.wrsamp
#510
Open
briangow
wants to merge
9
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
bg_wrsamp_multiple_fs
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1a9937f
update wfdb.io.wrsamp to allow writing a signal with unique samps_per…
briangow d7b5e93
add tests for wfdb.io.wrsamp for a signal with unique samps_per_frame
briangow 0e32209
address failing tests and feedback
briangow def62e9
correct signal name being set
briangow 11e8756
add missing import
briangow f8084d3
reformatted with black package
briangow 1e93bee
reformatted with black package
briangow 7bc468b
add wfdb.io.wrsamp signal checks
briangow 6b0d317
reformatted with black package
briangow File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this intentionally changing behavior for calls where
p_signal=None
andd_signal=None
? In the past, this would evaluate to False whene_p_signal=None
ande_d_signal=None
, but it now evaluates to True.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tompollard , if all signals are passed as None a failure will occur further down the line. @bemoody , do we want to allow all signals to be None when calling
wfdb.io.wrsamp
? If we don't want to allow that then I will leave the code as I have it which requires that one of the signals is set.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If passing
None
for both signals (p_signal
andd_signal
) previously resulted in an error, then the new behavior is an improvement. Unless people were intentioanlly calling the function with both signals set to None previously, this change isn't a problem.