Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency comment-parser to v1 #54

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 8, 2021

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
comment-parser (source) ^0.7.6 -> ^1.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

yavorskiy/comment-parser

v1.3.1

Compare Source

  • allow for valid empty jsdoc; fixes #​128

v1.3.0

Compare Source

  • add support for custom block markers

v1.2.4

Compare Source

  • reverting engine constraint back to ^12.0.0

v1.2.3

Compare Source

  • publishing missing fix: point package's main to .cjs file

v1.2.2

Compare Source

  • re-export ./util on the top-level for compatibility with older Node
  • point package's main to .cjs file

v1.2.1

Compare Source

  • bump engines per exports issues in earlier Node versions

v1.2.0

Compare Source

  • keep and handle appropriately CR line endings

v1.1.5

Compare Source

  • drop unused variables
  • add .editorconfig

v1.1.4

Compare Source

  • bugfix fix unsynced lib/

v1.1.3

Compare Source

  • export primitive type on the top level: Markers, Block, Spec, Line, Tokens, Problem

v1.1.2

Compare Source

  • bugfix Allow to build nested tags from name.subname even if name wasn't d
  • bugfix Preserve indentation when extracting comments

v1.1.1

Compare Source

  • add helpers for rewiring Spec.source <-> Spec.tags.source

v1.1.0

Compare Source

  • split tokenizers into separate modules
  • allow multiline {type} definitions - issue #​109
  • allow using "=>" in [name=default] defaults – issue #​112
  • allow using "=" in quoted [name=default] defaults – issue #​112
  • add tokenizers usage example - issue #​111

v1.0.1

Compare Source

v1.0.0

Compare Source

  • complete rewrite in TS with more flexible API

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 7am every weekday" in timezone Europe/Brussels, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/comment-parser-1.x branch from 6eac05b to c7ebc4d Compare January 14, 2021 11:27
@rubensworks rubensworks force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 29d4a39 to 2699050 Compare May 19, 2021 13:09
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/comment-parser-1.x branch from c7ebc4d to b3f76b6 Compare May 19, 2021 14:39
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/comment-parser-1.x branch from b3f76b6 to 8e8fb17 Compare June 14, 2021 13:36
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/comment-parser-1.x branch from 8e8fb17 to ef5d3b6 Compare June 30, 2021 16:40
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/comment-parser-1.x branch 2 times, most recently from ec03031 to 38a61c8 Compare March 2, 2022 15:48
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/comment-parser-1.x branch from 38a61c8 to 22ce4ae Compare May 4, 2022 20:47
@renovate
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Mar 23, 2023

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant