-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GeoDataFrame init #909
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
GeoDataFrame init #909
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good initial version :) just some comments here and there
import org.jetbrains.kotlinx.dataframe.api.with | ||
|
||
class GeoDataFrame<T : GeoFrame>(val df: DataFrame<T>, val crs: CoordinateReferenceSystem?) { | ||
fun update(updateBlock: DataFrame<T>.() -> DataFrame<T>): GeoDataFrame<T> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did you consider other names? Like
updateDf
replaceDf
(more consistent with what replace does in DF compared to update)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
replace
implies that we have df1 and df2, and we change df1 to df2. But in reality we are only modifying df1 slightly, using it as a receiver.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Btw, what do you think about modifyDf
then?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In my opinion "Df" is redundant and doesn't look good. Plus it's already clear from signature that it applies to DataFrame
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe .modify {}
or .transform {}
are okay?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
transform
doesn't look good to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@koperagen omitting "df" makes function not so obvious that it's the dataframe update and not something else.
dataframe-geo/src/main/kotlin/org/jetbrains/kotlinx/dataframe/geo/GeoDataFrame.kt
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
object Geocoder { | ||
|
||
private val url = "https://geo2.datalore.jetbrains.com/map_data/geocoding" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be included in the stock library? As far as I remember this was a reverse engineering endeavour and since it depends on an external URL behaviour might change or stop working entirely
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For this experimental module, I am totally fine with including in library.
- It's stable for enough time
- We not guarantee for a while all our releases of experimental geo-module
But we could also include this solution for the @Jolanrensen question:
- Checking the API availability and handling the unavailability with some exception
- Checking the API consistency and notification for the users or raise an exception
- Customize it with a URL parameter (if this API just will be moved in another place)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Geocoder is not part of the main API and will be removed/reworked completely (via future Kotlin geocoding library we discussed). I kept it, exclusively to play with it. So no effort should be wasted on it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably fine then :) You could add a small note in KDocs too telling this is experimental/temporary, so potential users won't get used to it.
dataframe-geo/src/main/kotlin/org/jetbrains/kotlinx/dataframe/jupyter/IntegrationGeo.kt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
dataframe-geo/src/main/kotlin/org/jetbrains/kotlinx/dataframe/geo/io/read.kt
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...eo/src/main/kotlin/org/jetbrains/kotlinx/dataframe/geo/geotools/toSimpleFeatureCollection.kt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
dataframe-geo/src/main/kotlin/org/jetbrains/kotlinx/dataframe/geo/geotools/ToGeoDataFrame.kt
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally, I am approving these changes, but want to summarize some thoughts and make this piece of code more mature and maintanable
repositories { | ||
// geo repositories should come before Maven Central | ||
maven("https://maven.geotoolkit.org") | ||
maven("https://repo.osgeo.org/repository/release") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it true, that these maven repo links will be hidden in the module, and the final user don't need to refer to them somehow in its Gradle script? (just for self checking)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately, the user will need to add the repository. However, I believe we can fix this with shadow jar.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
please check whether you can do that before this is merged
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd leave it that way for now, then I'll try to get rid of it. When using a descriptor in notebook, the user won't need to do this.
dataframe-geo/build.gradle.kts
Outdated
useJUnitPlatform() | ||
} | ||
kotlin { | ||
jvmToolchain(11) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we downgrade it somehow to 8?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have a global problem - DataFrame uses 8 and the Jupyter API uses 11. Therefore, in the future it will be necessary to allocate separate module(s) for integrations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
but for now, for convenience, I'd keep it 11
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, you can probably remove this piece, as kotlin.jvmToolChain(11)
is already called from the main build.gradle.kts
file; It configures all subprojects automatically to target jvm 8 in the published jars while setting the jvm toolchain (so the version gradle uses to build and test the project) to 11.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok
dataframe-geo/src/main/kotlin/org/jetbrains/kotlinx/dataframe/jupyter/IntegrationGeo.kt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
import org.locationtech.jts.geom.Polygon | ||
|
||
@DataSchema | ||
interface GeoFrame { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The name is lead in the wrong direction. It's not GeoFrame. It's close to wrappers for Geometry or Form or GeometryForm
I agree, that geometry is produced from Geo, but it's misleading me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because we have Geometry from jts, what do you think about Form or Figure or GeometryFigure/GeometryType or GeometryColumnType, verbose but clear
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
WithGeometry
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done
|
||
object Geocoder { | ||
|
||
private val url = "https://geo2.datalore.jetbrains.com/map_data/geocoding" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For this experimental module, I am totally fine with including in library.
- It's stable for enough time
- We not guarantee for a while all our releases of experimental geo-module
But we could also include this solution for the @Jolanrensen question:
- Checking the API availability and handling the unavailability with some exception
- Checking the API consistency and notification for the users or raise an exception
- Customize it with a URL parameter (if this API just will be moved in another place)
dataframe-geo/src/main/kotlin/org/jetbrains/kotlinx/dataframe/geo/GeoDataFrame.kt
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
dataframe-geo/src/main/kotlin/org/jetbrains/kotlinx/dataframe/geo/jts/geometryExtenstions.kt
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
return transformation.transform(this) | ||
} | ||
|
||
fun Geometry.translate(valueX: Double, valueY: Double): Geometry { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you consider renaming to somthing like shift/move for simplicity
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think "translate" is a common name in the math/geometry-world
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the main issue, that we are doing this not for math guys, but for Kotlin developers who are not familiar with all these concepts, and I am trying to make the naming simpler and more obvious
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's a well-established concept, so I can't agree:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Translation_(geometry)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with Andrei on this one. "translate" is common enough I think
} | ||
|
||
companion object { | ||
val DEFAULT_CRS = CRS.decode("EPSG:4326", true) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could be ENUM of different constants
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it even exists in some form in GeoTools (see DefaultEngineeringCRS). But here is a more global question - whether it is necessary to use geotools API directly or should we wrap it completely.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suggest not wrap for now, we could not avoid the learning of that
|
||
fun GeoDataFrame<*>.writeGeoJson(path: String): Unit = writeGeoJson(File(path)) | ||
|
||
fun GeoDataFrame<*>.writeGeoJson(file: File) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add for IO part some JUnit tests for reading/writing files close to your examples https://gist.github.com/AndreiKingsley/8eada06f174c681e953f8d939248d153
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done
dataframe-geo/src/main/kotlin/org/jetbrains/kotlinx/dataframe/geo/geocode/Geocoder.kt
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ | |||
package org.jetbrains.kotlinx.dataframe.geo.jts |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
typo in filename: *Extensions
|
||
|
||
fun GeoDataFrame.Companion.readGeoJson(path: String): GeoDataFrame<*> { | ||
return readGeoJson(asURL(path)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One thing the linter will complain about is that these should be expression functions. One ktLintFormat
can replace them all at once tho
import org.jetbrains.kotlinx.dataframe.api.update | ||
import org.jetbrains.kotlinx.dataframe.api.with | ||
|
||
/** |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good docs :D
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I gave you a compliment haha
*/ | ||
class GeoDataFrame<T : WithGeometry>(val df: DataFrame<T>, val crs: CoordinateReferenceSystem?) { | ||
/** | ||
* Updates the `GeoDataFrame` using a specified transformation block on the underlying DataFrame. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only thing I'd mention in these functions is that it doesn't simply "update" (which would mean the class is mutable), but it returns a new GeoDataFrame
copy with the dataframe being replaced
) | ||
} | ||
|
||
override fun equals(other: Any?): Boolean { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
missing hashCode and toString functions
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
} | ||
|
||
@get:JvmName("geometry") | ||
val <T : WithGeometry> ColumnsContainer<T>.geometry: DataColumn<Geometry> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the T
is not needed, right? ColumnsContainer<WithGeometry>
has the same effect
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, for the generated accessor we have both ColumnsContainer
and DataRow
extensions, so probably you should add DataRow<WithGeometry>.geometry: Geometry
etc. too :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@koperagen could plugin help here, to generate all these extensions?
Left a couple more comments :) Thanks for fixing some stuff already!
|
import org.jetbrains.kotlinx.dataframe.geo.WithGeometry | ||
import org.locationtech.jts.geom.Geometry | ||
|
||
fun SimpleFeatureCollection.toGeoDataFrame(): GeoDataFrame<*> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please document it with KDocs, looks like it will not change too much in future
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's worth to add in comment the summarization of the underlying algorithm
import org.jetbrains.kotlinx.dataframe.geo.GeoDataFrame | ||
import org.locationtech.jts.geom.Geometry | ||
|
||
fun GeoDataFrame<*>.toSimpleFeatureCollection( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add a KDoc, with tiny explanation (especially if some edge cases are not working for now)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For me it looks much more mature today, please fix comments/linter and it could be merged, I believe
No description provided.