Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move to Github145.testPerson7() failing test #802

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2024
Merged

Move to Github145.testPerson7() failing test #802

merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2024

Conversation

JooHyukKim
Copy link
Member

@JooHyukKim JooHyukKim commented May 30, 2024

Covers #801.

Refer to #375

@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

I think we should get this merged.

@JooHyukKim
Copy link
Member Author

I think we should get this merged.

Maybe @dinomite could help?

@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

@JooHyukKim Ah. I forgot that you probably do not yet have access to merge this. I do, will merge.

@cowtowncoder cowtowncoder merged commit 73f4ebf into FasterXML:2.18 May 31, 2024
20 checks passed
@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

Merged to 2.18, up to master; all tests now pass (except ones under failing/)

@k163377
Copy link
Contributor

k163377 commented Jun 8, 2024

@JooHyukKim @cowtowncoder
This test seems to fail locally for me.

By the way, can this test be removed?
Since it appears to be deserializing ignoring JsonCreator, I suspect that this test was successful due to some bug.

Therefore, I feel that this test should be removed.

@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

@k163377 Ultimately you are the module owner so I think your judgment is best here. FWTW I think you are right about test being broken so yeah, let's just remove it.

k163377 added a commit to k163377/jackson-module-kotlin that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2024
@k163377 k163377 mentioned this pull request Jun 9, 2024
@k163377
Copy link
Contributor

k163377 commented Jun 9, 2024

Removed
#804

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants