-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handle cases of LDAP DNs not being cased the same. #73
Conversation
Some LDAP servers seem to have different casing for group membership vs user DNs.
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
pkg/connector/group.go (2)
143-143
: LGTM: Consistent user DN casingConverting
userDN
to lowercase before creating a new grant ensures consistent casing of user Distinguished Names. This change aligns with the PR objective and is consistent with the earlier modification in thegroupResource
function.For consistency, consider assigning the lowercase value to a new variable:
- userDN = strings.ToLower(userDN) + lowercaseUserDN := strings.ToLower(userDN)Then use
lowercaseUserDN
in the subsequent code. This approach preserves the originaluserDN
value, which might be useful for debugging or logging purposes.
Line range hint
1-413
: Summary: Consistent handling of LDAP DN casingThe changes in this file successfully address the PR objective of handling cases where LDAP DNs are not cased the same. The modifications improve consistency in DN handling without altering the core functionality of the affected functions.
To further improve robustness, consider implementing a helper function for DN normalization. This would centralize the lowercase conversion logic and make it easier to modify or extend in the future if needed. For example:
func normalizeDN(dn string) string { return strings.ToLower(dn) }Then, use this function wherever DN normalization is required throughout the codebase. This approach would enhance maintainability and ensure consistent DN handling across all functions.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
scripts/ldif.js
is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- pkg/connector/group.go (3 hunks)
- pkg/connector/user.go (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
pkg/connector/user.go (2)
7-7
: LGTM: Import statement addition is appropriate.The addition of the
strings
package import is necessary and aligns with the PR objectives of handling case differences in LDAP DNs.
228-228
: LGTM: DN case normalization addresses the PR objective.The use of
strings.ToLower()
onuser.DN
ensures consistent casing of LDAP DNs, addressing the PR objective. This change improves the robustness of DN handling in the connector.To ensure consistency, let's verify the usage of DNs across the codebase:
Please review the results of this script to ensure that DN handling is consistent throughout the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: DN usage is consistent across the codebase.
No inconsistencies found beyond external dependencies in vendor directories.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for inconsistent DN casing usage across the codebase. # Test 1: Search for direct DN comparisons that might be affected by case sensitivity echo "Searching for potential case-sensitive DN comparisons:" rg --type go '(==|!=|strings\.Compare).*\.DN' # Test 2: Look for other occurrences of DN usage that might need case normalization echo "Searching for other DN usages that might need case normalization:" rg --type go '\.DN\s*[^=]*=' # Test 3: Check for any map or set usage with DNs as keys echo "Checking for map or set usage with DNs as keys:" rg --type go 'map\[string\].*DN|Set.*DN'Length of output: 1132
pkg/connector/group.go (2)
7-7
: LGTM: Addition ofstrings
packageThe addition of the
strings
package is appropriate for the subsequent changes in the file.
75-75
: LGTM: Consistent DN casingConverting
group.DN
to lowercase before passing it tors.NewGroupResource
ensures consistent casing of Distinguished Names. This change aligns with the PR objective of handling cases where LDAP DNs might have inconsistent casing.
Some LDAP servers seem to have different casing for group membership vs user DNs.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes