reviewdog [remark-lint-suggestions] report
reported by reviewdog 🐶
Findings (2)
common-practices-tools/contribution/contrib-first.md|29 col 171| Unexpected potentially insensitive use of pop
, in somes cases parent
may be better dad-mom retext-equality
common-practices-tools/README.md|9 col 17| Unexpected potentially insensitive use of stewards
, in somes cases flight attendants
may be better stewardesses-stewards retext-equality
Filtered Findings (0)
Annotations
Check warning on line 29 in common-practices-tools/contribution/contrib-first.md
github-actions / remark-lint-suggestions
[remark-lint-suggestions] common-practices-tools/contribution/contrib-first.md#L29
Unexpected potentially insensitive use of `pop`, in somes cases `parent` may be better dad-mom retext-equality
Raw output
29:168-29:171 warning Unexpected potentially insensitive use of `pop`, in somes cases `parent` may be better dad-mom retext-equality
Check warning on line 9 in common-practices-tools/README.md
github-actions / remark-lint-suggestions
[remark-lint-suggestions] common-practices-tools/README.md#L9
Unexpected potentially insensitive use of `stewards`, in somes cases `flight attendants` may be better stewardesses-stewards retext-equality
Raw output
9:9-9:17 warning Unexpected potentially insensitive use of `stewards`, in somes cases `flight attendants` may be better stewardesses-stewards retext-equality