Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[doc] Tidy hugr specification #413

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2023
Merged

Conversation

doug-q
Copy link
Collaborator

@doug-q doug-q commented Aug 16, 2023

Among others, uniformly refer to graph edges as edges rather than wires.

Note that SimpleType and ClassicalType have been mostly removed from the spec, my mentions here should be checked.

Copy link
Member

@ss2165 ss2165 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, just one sentence that needs looking at

specification/hugr.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@doug-q
Copy link
Collaborator Author

doug-q commented Aug 29, 2023

I've rebased, please have another look.

Comment on lines 1082 to 1083
I’m going to define them in terms of resources. We have the “builtin”
resource which should always be available when writing hugr plugins.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this now the only mention of resources? does it need defining elsewhere?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed, I've changed this to "We will define them in terms of extensions"

Among others, uniformly refer to graph edges as edges rather than wires.
@doug-q doug-q added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 7, 2023
Merged via the queue into CQCL:main with commit 204df83 Sep 7, 2023
6 checks passed
@doug-q doug-q deleted the feature/tidy-hugr-spec branch September 7, 2023 08:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants