Added Opticks hits code #56
Conversation
| <property name="RINDEX" ref="RINDEX0x560299349730"/> | ||
| <property name="GROUPVEL" ref="GROUPVEL0x560299349110"/> | ||
| <property name="RINDEX" ref="RINDEX0x5602993a1df1"/> | ||
| <property name="GROUPVEL" ref="GROUPVEL0x56029938bb90"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What was the reason for changing these properties for G4_AIR? Was it needed to see hits?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No hits with Opticks yet. I was experimenting around how to get hits. At this point I am not sure if it is an issue with the GDML or an issue with how we simulate photons.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So, just to confirm this change is not relevant for getting G4 hits, correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct, for G4Hits irrelevant. But we want Optickshits too.
| <property name="RINDEX" ref="RINDEX0x5602993a1df3"/> | ||
| <property name="GROUPVEL" ref="GROUPVEL0x56029938bb90"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Rindex is needed for all materials. I have tried running without refractive index before and there were no hits. I am not sure if GROUPVEL is needed or not, some GDML uses it, some not.
| <property name="RINDEX" ref="RINDEX0x5602993a1df2"/> | ||
| <property name="GROUPVEL" ref="GROUPVEL0x56029938bb90"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same question. Do we need to define a GROUPVEL property to see hits in this volume?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think they are not a must.
| <gdml_simple_extension xmlns:gdml_simple_extension="http://www.example.org" | ||
| xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" | ||
| xs:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="SimpleExtension.xsd"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What is the point of switching to this new tag, gdml_simple_extension?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Worked in CaTS, copied here. Not sure if has effect.
No description provided.