Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Default Experiences #1536

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cameronking4
Copy link

Generating Azure Portal default experiences using Typespec, link to latest documentation.

Using link rather than copying over content for easier maintenance.

@timotheeguerin
Copy link
Member

/azp run typespec-azure - PR Tools

@Azure Azure deleted a comment from azure-pipelines bot Sep 19, 2024
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

No changes needing a change description found.

@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

You can try these changes here

🛝 Playground 🌐 Website 📚 Next docs

@cameronking4
Copy link
Author

/azp run typespec-azure - PR Tools

Copy link

Commenter does not have sufficient privileges for PR 1536 in repo Azure/typespec-azure

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
# Generating experiences in Azure Portal with TypeSpec

Go to the [TypeSpec guide](https://eng.ms/docs/products/azure-portal-framework-ibizafx/declarative/typespec) to learn how to customize your Azure Portal experience, generated by default for your ARM resource type. Azure Resource Providers can apply TypeSpec decorators to generate and brand Azure Portal experiences.
Copy link
Contributor

@yejee94 yejee94 Sep 27, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: "generated by default for your ARM resource type" bit confusing for me :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants