-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update cache key for composer dependencies #9637
Conversation
Test the buildOption 1. Jetpack Beta
Option 2. Jurassic Ninja - available for logged-in A12s🚀 Launch a JN site with this branch 🚀 ℹ️ Install this Tampermonkey script to get more options. Build info:
Note: the build is updated when a new commit is pushed to this PR. |
Size Change: 0 B Total Size: 1.34 MB ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ runs: | |||
uses: actions/cache@v4 | |||
with: | |||
path: ./vendor |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This line hasn't been changed in this PR, but should we take the advantage to update the path
value from this workflow to ~/.cache/composer/
to match the others? This is the only one using vendor
, and I've read that caching the global composer cache is considered a good practice, and seems to be more efficient in terms of space.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@alopezari On E2E tests env setup action we cache the vendor directory because we're caching the installed dependencies where as rest of the workflows cache the package files downloaded by composer but they need run composer install.
The cache handling for E2E setup prevents running composer install and restores the whole vendor directory, but rest of the workflows are not configured this way. We can look at unifying this as another task. WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, sounds good!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for implementing this change and following up on my question, @achyuthajoy!
Approving this PR 👍
Fixes #9478
Changes proposed in this Pull Request
composer.json
&composer.lock
.composer.json
was updated.Testing instructions
Linux-composer-<composer.json-hash>-<composer.lock-hash>
in the GitHub actions logs. Previously it wasLinux-composer-<composer.lock-hash>
.npm run changelog
to add a changelog file, choosepatch
to leave it empty if the change is not significant. You can add multiple changelog files in one PR by running this command a few times.Post merge