-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 306
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
256515d
commit c7d1ad5
Showing
1 changed file
with
43 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ | ||
Two-level scheduling is a strategy used in operating systems to manage processes efficiently. It divides the scheduling process into two distinct phases to balance resource usage and system responsiveness, particularly in systems with a mix of interactive and batch processes. | ||
|
||
### Description of Two-Level Scheduling | ||
|
||
1. **First Level (Long-Term Scheduling):** | ||
- The long-term scheduler, also called the admission scheduler, determines which processes are admitted to the system for execution. | ||
- It decides the overall mix of active processes in the system by selecting a subset from a larger pool of tasks. Only a portion of processes are allowed into memory based on system resource availability. | ||
- Long-term scheduling helps control the degree of multiprogramming (i.e., the number of concurrent processes in memory). | ||
|
||
2. **Second Level (Short-Term Scheduling):** | ||
- The short-term scheduler, or CPU scheduler, operates on the processes that are already in memory. | ||
- It frequently selects one of these processes to execute on the CPU, switching between processes as needed to optimize CPU utilization and system responsiveness. | ||
- Short-term scheduling uses various algorithms (e.g., round-robin, priority scheduling) to decide which process gets CPU time next. | ||
|
||
### Pros of Two-Level Scheduling | ||
|
||
1. **Improved Resource Utilization:** | ||
- Long-term scheduling controls memory usage by limiting the number of concurrent processes, helping to reduce memory thrashing (frequent page swaps). | ||
|
||
2. **Enhanced System Performance:** | ||
- By focusing on short-term scheduling among active processes, it achieves higher CPU utilization and responsiveness, especially beneficial for interactive applications. | ||
|
||
3. **Reduced Overhead in Process Management:** | ||
- By admitting only a manageable number of processes to memory, the system reduces overhead in handling context switching and managing process queues. | ||
|
||
4. **Flexibility with Different Process Types:** | ||
- Works well in systems with mixed workloads by allowing batch jobs to run efficiently in the background and giving priority to interactive tasks. | ||
|
||
### Cons of Two-Level Scheduling | ||
|
||
1. **Increased Complexity:** | ||
- Requires careful design and tuning to manage the two levels of scheduling effectively, adding to the complexity of the operating system. | ||
|
||
2. **Potential Latency for Batch Processes:** | ||
- Long-term scheduling may delay certain processes (especially lower-priority or batch jobs), affecting the turnaround time for such tasks. | ||
|
||
3. **Memory Management Challenges:** | ||
- Determining the right mix of processes admitted to memory requires sophisticated memory management, and poor decisions may lead to inefficient memory usage. | ||
|
||
4. **Higher Initial Overhead:** | ||
- The process of admitting and scheduling processes at two levels can introduce some initial overhead, potentially slowing down system responsiveness under heavy load conditions. | ||
|
||
Two-level scheduling is particularly beneficial for multi-user systems and real-time applications where maintaining responsiveness for interactive users is critical. However, the additional complexity requires careful management and may not be suitable for simpler or single-user systems. |