Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ingress > WAF > Don't create new stack #446

Open
janavenkat opened this issue Oct 18, 2021 · 6 comments
Open

Ingress > WAF > Don't create new stack #446

janavenkat opened this issue Oct 18, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@janavenkat
Copy link

janavenkat commented Oct 18, 2021

WAF is already provisioned by client side. So that adding the parameter --aws-waf-web-acl-id controller should not create the new cloud formation/load-balancer stack or is there any restriction? that's why controller is creating new stack.

controller version: v0.12.5

@szuecs
Copy link
Member

szuecs commented Oct 18, 2021

@janavenkat I think the controller creates a new stack because if you have many ingress and only a few use the waf annotation, we make sure that the rest will stay on the old load balancer and we create a new one for the new configuration.
Does it make sense to you?

@janavenkat
Copy link
Author

@szuecs yes it's make sense when we have different ingress and we define via the annotatoin then it will end up in 2 stack one with waf and another without. What my concern is am starting waf association globally yes at the end there will be only one stack. Why we're creating new stack for global association?

@szuecs
Copy link
Member

szuecs commented Oct 19, 2021

@janavenkat sounds like a maybe bug. Does it hurt?

@janavenkat
Copy link
Author

janavenkat commented Oct 19, 2021

@szuecs yeah am wondering we could do the association, de-association without create a new stack?

@szuecs
Copy link
Member

szuecs commented Oct 19, 2021

I guess in theory yes and it's an optimization of course

@janavenkat
Copy link
Author

@janavenkat sounds like a maybe bug. Does it hurt?

It's hard to say it's a bug, it does the work the only problem i see it creates new stack. can we have this in optimization list?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants