You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
HRRR-smoke is a product of my lab, but not from the renewable energy (ASRE) program. Ravan Ahmadov is the primary developer. It is a high visibility and important product for the NWS, and I would love to have multiple ways to evaluate it.
I think it would be super to compare the two models, especially if we can pull in PM2.5 and/or CALIPSO data too. It might make a good undergraduate or MS level project, if you have an interested student. I might be able to secure a small amount of funding for this, if we can develop a good science plan (and if the current presidents budget makes it through congress)...
Dave
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If you do this comparison in the future, keep in mind that the BlueSky process persists fire locations that are 3 days old. This can lead to some strange comparisons.
From Dave Turner at NOAA:
Hi Von,
HRRR-smoke is a product of my lab, but not from the renewable energy (ASRE) program. Ravan Ahmadov is the primary developer. It is a high visibility and important product for the NWS, and I would love to have multiple ways to evaluate it.
I think it would be super to compare the two models, especially if we can pull in PM2.5 and/or CALIPSO data too. It might make a good undergraduate or MS level project, if you have an interested student. I might be able to secure a small amount of funding for this, if we can develop a good science plan (and if the current presidents budget makes it through congress)...
Dave
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: