Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Simplification of the menclose element #105

Closed
fred-wang opened this issue Jun 19, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Simplification of the menclose element #105

fred-wang opened this issue Jun 19, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@fred-wang
Copy link

See also #104 and #3

I would like to discuss how much the menclose notations are used, whether they could be replaced with CSS etc

In practice, my feeling is that I've mostly seen (rounded) box and roundedbox (which can be replaced with CSS), updiagonalstrike and circle.

Also, I don't like that some notations are not direction/writing-mode friendly.

I think menclose is the kind of candidate for "custom MathML element" where people could extend mrow with their own drawing of special enclosing/striking notations.
@fred-wang fred-wang mentioned this issue Jun 19, 2019
Closed
@fred-wang fred-wang mentioned this issue Jul 5, 2019
Closed
@fred-wang fred-wang mentioned this issue Sep 16, 2019
Closed
@fred-wang fred-wang mentioned this issue Oct 4, 2019
Closed
fred-wang added a commit to web-platform-tests/wpt that referenced this issue Jan 20, 2020
@fred-wang
Relax feature-detection for <menclose>
cdba9fd 
Discussion is still open: w3c/mathml#105
so let's only check some minimal <mrow> support.

Igalia does not plan to implement this element in Chromium for now so
making detection too strict is causing test failures.
@fred-wang fred-wang mentioned this issue Jan 20, 2020
Merged
fred-wang added a commit to web-platform-tests/wpt that referenced this issue Jan 20, 2020
@fred-wang
Relax feature-detection for <menclose> (#21256)
ee2b3c3 
Discussion is still open: w3c/mathml#105
so let's only check some minimal <mrow> support.

Igalia does not plan to implement this element in Chromium for now so
making detection too strict is causing test failures.
xeonchen pushed a commit to xeonchen/gecko that referenced this issue Jan 23, 2020
@fred-wang @moz-wptsync-bot
Bug 1610238 [wpt PR 21256] - Relax feature-detection for <menclose>, …
9e9fb09 
…a=testonly

Automatic update from web-platform-tests
Relax feature-detection for <menclose> (#21256)

Discussion is still open: w3c/mathml#105
so let's only check some minimal <mrow> support.

Igalia does not plan to implement this element in Chromium for now so
making detection too strict is causing test failures.
--

wpt-commits: ee2b3c3d8740dcfccf6d6a0c5a371335dd198654
wpt-pr: 21256
moz-v2v-gh pushed a commit to mozilla/gecko-dev that referenced this issue Jan 23, 2020
@fred-wang @moz-wptsync-bot
Bug 1610238 [wpt PR 21256] - Relax feature-detection for <menclose>, …
66ff0b0 
…a=testonly

Automatic update from web-platform-tests
Relax feature-detection for <menclose> (#21256)

Discussion is still open: w3c/mathml#105
so let's only check some minimal <mrow> support.

Igalia does not plan to implement this element in Chromium for now so
making detection too strict is causing test failures.
--

wpt-commits: ee2b3c3d8740dcfccf6d6a0c5a371335dd198654
wpt-pr: 21256
gecko-dev-updater pushed a commit to marco-c/gecko-dev-comments-removed that referenced this issue Jan 28, 2020
@marco-c
Bug 1610238 [wpt PR 21256] - Relax feature-detection for <menclose>, …
3651e08 
…a=testonly

Automatic update from web-platform-tests
Relax feature-detection for <menclose> (#21256)

Discussion is still open: w3c/mathml#105
so let's only check some minimal <mrow> support.

Igalia does not plan to implement this element in Chromium for now so
making detection too strict is causing test failures.
--

wpt-commits: ee2b3c3d8740dcfccf6d6a0c5a371335dd198654
wpt-pr: 21256

UltraBlame original commit: 636f59cb8640669c6417462eae91bda7fbd29029
gecko-dev-updater pushed a commit to marco-c/gecko-dev-wordified that referenced this issue Jan 28, 2020
@marco-c
Bug 1610238 [wpt PR 21256] - Relax feature-detection for <menclose>, …
7facc78 
…a=testonly

Automatic update from web-platform-tests
Relax feature-detection for <menclose> (#21256)

Discussion is still open: w3c/mathml#105
so let's only check some minimal <mrow> support.

Igalia does not plan to implement this element in Chromium for now so
making detection too strict is causing test failures.
--

wpt-commits: ee2b3c3d8740dcfccf6d6a0c5a371335dd198654
wpt-pr: 21256

UltraBlame original commit: 636f59cb8640669c6417462eae91bda7fbd29029
fred-wang added a commit to w3c/mathml-core that referenced this issue May 9, 2020
@fred-wang
Remove current text for menclose
3ee1dc5 
This element really needs to be reworked and has been a source of
confusion for external people when presenting MathML Core or when
writing web platform tests. Let's remove this from the text of the
spec for now and current text and discussion to a separate PR.

w3c/mathml#105
fred-wang added a commit to w3c/mathml-core that referenced this issue May 9, 2020
@fred-wang
Add menclose element from MathML3
be8a644 
w3c/mathml#105
@fred-wang fred-wang mentioned this issue May 9, 2020
Open
@fred-wang
Copy link
Author

The fact that "menclose" is present in MathML Core but that there is no plan to implement it in Chromium has been a source of confusion when discussing with externals (TAG, Google, a11y people...) or when writing WPT tests. I've also never been satisfied with the current description which is not as good as the rest of the spec. So moved the current draft into

w3c/mathml-core#24

in order to avoid polluting the current text with low-quality WIP things and many "ISSUE" labels. Let's go back to this when the future of menclose is clearer.

@NSoiffer NSoiffer mentioned this issue May 11, 2020
Closed
@fred-wang fred-wang mentioned this issue May 22, 2020
Open
@fred-wang
Copy link
Author

merged into #216

@bkardell bkardell mentioned this issue May 28, 2024
Open
@Elchi3 Elchi3 mentioned this issue Jul 1, 2024
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@fred-wang