You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Types whose creation has not been recorded are not propagated to the UML model, which sounds like intended behaviour. However, this is a problem, if those types are referenced in the recorded model. This concerns in particular the types of the Java class library (e.g., java.lang.Object or java.util.Collection). In the UML model, references to those external types become null references.
As discussed in the latests Vitruv ConCall (October 28, 2021), a possible solution could be to create stubs (dummy types) for all referenced external types.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Types whose creation has not been recorded are not propagated to the UML model, which sounds like intended behaviour. However, this is a problem, if those types are referenced in the recorded model. This concerns in particular the types of the Java class library (e.g., java.lang.Object or java.util.Collection). In the UML model, references to those external types become null references.
As discussed in the latests Vitruv ConCall (October 28, 2021), a possible solution could be to create stubs (dummy types) for all referenced external types.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: