You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The MultisigControl scheme that has been implemented works well and keeps the control of locked funds out of the hands of any single party. The downside is that at-present it costs approximately $0.01 per signature submitted to the smart contract. This also is not readily applicable to other blockchains (such as BTC). A proper TSS brings that down to $0.01 total as only a single signature is needed to be recovered.
As @Vegaklaus pointed out, interactive TSS is weak to a denial of service attack where one party simply drops out during the signature process, requiring a restart. This can be avoided in a non-interactive version, but everything found thus far is not easily recoverable on Ethereum and wouldn't work with BTC.
Requirements:
non-interactive
ECC/ECDSA compatible result signature
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The MultisigControl scheme that has been implemented works well and keeps the control of locked funds out of the hands of any single party. The downside is that at-present it costs approximately $0.01 per signature submitted to the smart contract. This also is not readily applicable to other blockchains (such as BTC). A proper TSS brings that down to $0.01 total as only a single signature is needed to be recovered.
As @Vegaklaus pointed out, interactive TSS is weak to a denial of service attack where one party simply drops out during the signature process, requiring a restart. This can be avoided in a non-interactive version, but everything found thus far is not easily recoverable on Ethereum and wouldn't work with BTC.
Requirements:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: