You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Would it make sense for °↯ to behave like △.? It seems like it would be in line with °√ already behaving like ×..
(By the way, I'm loving the work on making more of the language invertible. Sometimes if I'm writing a function that needs to go both ways, like before/after serialization, more and more is automatically invertible so only one or two bits need to be wrapped in a setinv. This suggestion stems from trying to remove as many setinvs as I can from my code)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Good question. You know best which would make more sense. My main motivation was just to be able to write something like F ← Foo △. with the expectation that °F will "just work" if Foo is invertible too. But ⊃△♭ might indeed be the more general inversion, so I'd vote for that.
Would it make sense for
°↯
to behave like△.
? It seems like it would be in line with°√
already behaving like×.
.(By the way, I'm loving the work on making more of the language invertible. Sometimes if I'm writing a function that needs to go both ways, like before/after serialization, more and more is automatically invertible so only one or two bits need to be wrapped in a
setinv
. This suggestion stems from trying to remove as manysetinv
s as I can from my code)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: