We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Better VASP uniqueness
Currently we only check uniqueness on commonName but not the legalName, which leaves open a loophole that we want to close with this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Related to trisacrypto/trisa#53 and #34
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Better VASP uniqueness
Currently we only check uniqueness on commonName but not the legalName, which leaves open a loophole that we want to close with this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: