Replies: 1 comment
-
Looking at the implementation it's:
I am wondering if we need to implement identifier scanner in the external scanner eventually. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
We have an issue (#141) to support leading infix operators
The doc defines them as
What is a symbolic identifier, formally? Is it
op
from the syntax reference?Our tree-sitter grammar does not define a separate rule this type of identifier, it's being a part of
$.operator_identifier
Probably, if we had a separate rule for this symbolic identifer, we could tweak the external scanner to stop issuing AUTOMATED_SEMICOLON tokens when encountering a valid position for leading infix expression
Do you have any thoughts on this? 🤔
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions