-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Maybe suggest using BBR congestion control? #22
Comments
I don't regard BBR as baked enough to recommend. |
Thanks a lot for your answer Dave! |
Iván Baldo <[email protected]> writes:
Thanks a lot for your answer Dave!
Now more than two and a half years later, whats your opinion on using
BBR?
BTW I been using it together with fq_codel and ECN=1 since then at
home and one of my customers, didn't notice any problems so far... (of
course this is just my case and I am not as expert as you, just
comenting).
Ultimately, ecn or no, BBR will construct a good model of the path, and
fq_codel garuntees that that is, indeed a good model.
That said, I'd really like to see RFC3168-like behavior enter bbr.
…
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
For kernel >= 4.9 maybe it should be suggested to add this in sysctl:
net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control = bbr
And this in /etc/modules:
tcp_bbr
Maybe I am wrong though... but if thats the case, then it could be mentioned in the webpage why I am wrong so others don't ask themselves this same question.
Thanks a lot!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: