Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kernelSU内核在0.9.3之后无法正确授权按键精灵root权限 #2045

Open
3 tasks done
imkion opened this issue Sep 9, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #2084
Open
3 tasks done

kernelSU内核在0.9.3之后无法正确授权按键精灵root权限 #2045

imkion opened this issue Sep 9, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #2084

Comments

@imkion
Copy link

imkion commented Sep 9, 2024

Please check before submitting an issue

  • I have searched the issues and haven't found anything relevant
  • I will upload bugreport file in KernelSU Manager - Settings - Report log
  • I know how to reproduce the issue which may not be specific to my device

Describe the bug

kernelSU内核版本在0.9.3之后(也就是0.9.4到1.0.1)均无法正确授权按键精灵root权限,而在0.9.3及以下没有这个bug。

To Reproduce

下载最新版按键精灵:https://www.123pan.com/s/zJGRVv-1FU0A,然后打开kernelSU管理器授权按键精灵超级用户权限,最后打开按键精灵会提示没有root权限。

Expected behavior

由于无法使用脚本,只能降级到旧版本kernelsu,而无法使用新特性,对此我感到很遗憾。

Screenshots

Uploading QQ图片20240909103018.jpg…

Logs

No response

Device info

  • Device:OnePlus Ace2 Pro
  • OS Version:13
  • KernelSU Version:0.9.4~1.0.1
  • Kernel Version:5.15.74~5.15.123

Additional context

No response

@imkion imkion changed the title kernelSU内核在0.7.3之后无法正确授权按键精灵root权限 kernelSU内核在0.9.3之后无法正确授权按键精灵root权限 Sep 9, 2024
@hamjin
Copy link

hamjin commented Sep 9, 2024

duplicate #1813

@heinhuiz
Copy link

This issue starts on 0.9.3, so 0.9.2 is the latest usable version.

@hamjin hamjin linked a pull request Sep 21, 2024 that will close this issue
ravindu644 added a commit to ravindu644/a05s_stock that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants