-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove "No-IK" simple planner LVS profile #424
Comments
I think it would be find merging the two as log as we add an option to indicate if the seed should be used or run IK. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
As far as I can tell, the
SimplePlannerLVSNoIKPlanProfile
is now the same as theSimplePlannerLVSPlanProfile
version. The "no IK" piece seems to be handled by checking whether the Cartesian waypoint has a seed state associated with it. If it does, then that seed state is used as the joint state with which to interpolate (i.e., "no IK"); if not, IK is performed to get the associated joint state. If this is in fact the case, we should remove theSimplePlannerLVSNoIKPlanProfile
class to eliminate confusionThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: