You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Following our discussion during the conference with @TobiKattmann, I wanted to start the discussion on the quasi-newton coupling for multi-zone problems. I did a bit of reading and found the relevant material and I followed it at least to some extent.
Now, upon a bit of digging, I see that @pcarruscag already implemented this for the FSI problem and is available in feature_fsi_iqn (v6.2.0).
So should we upgrade this method to v8.0.0? So that all other problems can benefit from this? Or are we still missing something in this implementation? Me and @praharsh09 are trying to understand the effort required to have this method in.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello,
Following our discussion during the conference with @TobiKattmann, I wanted to start the discussion on the quasi-newton coupling for multi-zone problems. I did a bit of reading and found the relevant material and I followed it at least to some extent.
Now, upon a bit of digging, I see that @pcarruscag already implemented this for the FSI problem and is available in feature_fsi_iqn (v6.2.0).
So should we upgrade this method to v8.0.0? So that all other problems can benefit from this? Or are we still missing something in this implementation? Me and @praharsh09 are trying to understand the effort required to have this method in.
Cheers,
Nitish
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions