-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 842
Replies: 3 comments · 12 replies
-
Can you post the config file/conditions you are using? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
Thanks. I know you mentioned the adiabatic wall works well. Also what does your mesh look like at the nose? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
Thanks for your reply. I will get back soon after AUSM run. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
Interesting. The mesh looks to well-enough resolved at nose. There may be issues with symmetry plan/axis of rotation and heatflux. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
I have calculated using AUSMPLUSUP scheme. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
You are running this with CFL 0.1, has the solver converged? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
Does Re affects the solution results when I used the following options?MACH_NUMBER= 6.0
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
I will check and report after trying that V&V cases. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
Hey @kohyun, I am running very similar geometry at very similar conditions (lower unit Reynolds number though) and I also have a problem with isothermal BC not being maintained along the wall. Have you managed to troubleshoot this problem? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
The isothermal boundary is imposed weakly, that is, a heat flux is computed with the isothermal temperature and the temperature just inside the domain. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
👍 1
-
Makes sense, thank you! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
This discussion was converted from issue #1745 on August 27, 2022 14:44.
-
Hi all,
I'm trying to simulate SWBLI VKI blunt body.
It requires a constant wall temperature boundary condition (Tw=300K).
I applied the following MARKER.
MARKER_ISOTHERMAL = (wall, 300.0)
But the result shows non-uniform temperature on the wall. (see figure below)
For the adiabatic wall BC case, the simulation looks good but has some discrepancy from the experiment.
The followings are environments I am using.
Desktop (please complete the following information):
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions