Planned changes to the Starknet docs Github repo #964
Replies: 5 comments
-
@ArielElp @LandauRaz @agongdai @lorcan-codes @wojciechos @odednaor @Mirko-von-Leipzig @LucasLvy @jelilat @glrn @dan-ziv @dbejarano820 @AkromDev @ptisserand @Eikix @robertkodra @tdelabro @glihm @yuvalsw @anshulforyou @roi-amaler-starkware @daizhengxue @adishildan @Brivan-26 @omahs @barretodavid @xgrizx @milancermak @thecotne @bbrandtom @nikeshnazareth @emnul @bigant88 @tudorpintea999 @zzq0826 @pandabadger @Swarag-N @AlvaroLuken @tekkac @ivpavici @tshakalekholoane cc: @stoobie You are receiving this because you have contributed to the Starknet documentation. Before making any additional contributions, please see the announcement in this discussion. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@stoobie for the Contributors list, this tool is used on many repos: https://allcontributors.org/ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
DONE: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Update: DONE Change the name of Please follow these steps to update your local repos to use
Source: danieldogeanu/RenameGitBranch.md |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Previously, this repo used tags as part of the workflow. I removed this step as it had no particular relevance to this repo. As a result, the Changelog is no longer updated. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi Folks,
This is Steve. I'm a technical writer at StarkWare and I maintain the Starknet docs.
I want to let you know about some minor changes I'm planning to make in the repo, essentially to streamline processes and fix some bugs.
master
instead ofdev
. DONE in chore: remove dev branch from workflows #961. : Using adev
branch is a normal part of a source code repo, but the docs flow does not require this branch, and it adds an unnecessary step in the release and publishing flow. In a case where a PR should not be published immediately, such as a feature that is not yet released, a release branch is created to hold that content until the official release date. For example, docs: Addon_receive
function interface and note about backward compatibility #933.master
the default branch. DONE (Possibly eventually remove thedev
branch, since it is redundant.)I'm not sure about the order of the following changes.
master
tomain
, consistent with the default Github repo naming convention, as well as other doc-related repos in the starknet-io Github org. I think this is the right thing to do and it's something I've been meaning to do for awhile.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions