Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Link to "build a classic WAR file" goes to a 404 page #163

Open
blackcoder41 opened this issue Sep 11, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Link to "build a classic WAR file" goes to a 404 page #163

blackcoder41 opened this issue Sep 11, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@blackcoder41
Copy link

https://spring.io/guides/gs/accessing-data-jpa

@Buzzardo
Copy link
Contributor

We removed that file a while back. The link in the guides should be removed, too. This is a good one for someone who wants a place to get started on contributing to Spring.

@robertmcnees
Copy link

When the guides are archived, they are usually moved here to the spring-attic. For this particular issue, you can see where jar to war landed.

In the past I've seen this type of issue addressed in the individual repos. So perhaps opening an issue in the specific repository would get a faster response from the community. If it gets tagged with good first issue those usually go pretty fast. This link isn't even the only broken one on the page, as the gemfire link is also broken for the same reason.

If anyone wants to delete this line about building a WAR file, it would be a PR to the shared repository, specifically this file. It would fix a good number of guides I'm guessing.

@TejasNarkhede
Copy link

Thank you, @blackcoder41, @Buzzardo, and @robertmcnees, for your helpful insights and guidance on this issue! I’ve submitted a PR to remove the broken link. I really appreciate the direction you provided, which made it easier to tackle this fix. Looking forward to contributing more to the project!

My PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants