Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Code Review: PR group work synchronisation #49

Open
steve-crouch opened this issue Oct 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Code Review: PR group work synchronisation #49

steve-crouch opened this issue Oct 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
@anenadic @steve-crouch
Labels
Content Could Have (CH)
Milestone
Pilot2 refinement...

Comments

@steve-crouch
Copy link
Contributor

In one room, there were not enough people who had full versions of the repo, the people who do end up paired with people who don’t and have nothing to do.

It would work better if it was rejigged to be based on a single repo in the group
OR: Provide a working version of the repo up to this point for people to template off
People without working repos are furthest behind, so slowest to implement changes
@steve-crouch steve-crouch changed the title Code Review: PR group work is problematic Code Review: PR group work synchronisation Oct 19, 2022
@anenadic
Copy link
Contributor

anenadic commented Nov 16, 2022 •
edited
Loading

We could have a separate template repo for each week of the course to start off if people are behind.

@anenadic
Copy link
Contributor

Related to #85

@anenadic anenadic mentioned this issue Nov 30, 2022
Open
5 tasks
@anenadic anenadic added this to the Pilot2 refinement sprint 2 milestone Nov 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@anenadic anenadic

@steve-crouch steve-crouch

Labels
Content Could Have (CH)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Pilot2 refinement sprint 2
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@anenadic @steve-crouch