-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use 'Numeric' instead of 'Float' as BQ column type when field type in the json schema is number #112
Comments
voropaevp
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 18, 2023
… the json schema is number (close #112)
voropaevp
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 18, 2023
… the json schema is number (close #112)
voropaevp
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 18, 2023
… the json schema is number (close #112)
voropaevp
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 26, 2023
… the json schema is number (close #112)
voropaevp
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 27, 2023
… the json schema is number (close #112)
voropaevp
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 27, 2023
… the json schema is number (close #112)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Currently, when field type in the json schema is number, BQ column type is made
Float
. However, usingNumeric
type might be better since it has more human-presented result.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: