You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@sheadawson thanks for the great module, I am finding it pretty easy to get along with and am using it within a number of GridField_ItemEditForms successfully.
I am also trying to make use of it as a filter field to search through results in the list of a GridField using the searchableFields() method (defined on DataObject) on a class of my own (a sub-class of DataObject). For example:
http://jbba.joeharvey.local:8080/admin/payments/CreditTransaction/field/q[DestinationID]/load?val=Fixture which returns a HTTP 404 Not Found and the response Action 'field' isn't available on class PaymentAdmin..
This suggests to me that the field type/module isn't supported in the context of ModelAdmin search fields, is that right or am I doing something wrong?
If that is accurate, would this be functionality you'd be willing to add?
Thanks in advance,
HARVS1789UK
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
HARVS1789UK
changed the title
Compatibility with ModelAdmin filters and $searchable_fields
Compatibility with ModelAdmin filters and $searchable_fields
Aug 28, 2018
@sheadawson thanks for the great module, I am finding it pretty easy to get along with and am using it within a number of
GridField_ItemEditForm
s successfully.I am also trying to make use of it as a filter field to search through results in the list of a GridField using the
searchableFields()
method (defined onDataObject
) on a class of my own (a sub-class of DataObject). For example:This makes a request to:
http://jbba.joeharvey.local:8080/admin/payments/CreditTransaction/field/q[DestinationID]/load?val=Fixture
which returns a HTTP 404 Not Found and the responseAction 'field' isn't available on class PaymentAdmin.
.This suggests to me that the field type/module isn't supported in the context of ModelAdmin search fields, is that right or am I doing something wrong?
If that is accurate, would this be functionality you'd be willing to add?
Thanks in advance,
HARVS1789UK
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: