Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cannot sim a 447 version of crafted ring #415

Closed
wheatbread opened this issue Jul 12, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Cannot sim a 447 version of crafted ring #415

wheatbread opened this issue Jul 12, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@wheatbread
Copy link

wheatbread commented Jul 12, 2023

If your bug is related to an incorrect tooltip, check the Full HTML Results before reporting! #288

Describe the bug
When I click the + sign on a 421 Signet of Titanic Insight in the sim, it will let me sim a 424 and 437 version, but not a 447 version. The 447 option is grayed out, saying "cannot afford". I'm not sure why it says this, as I have a spark of shadowflame and 34 aspect crests.

I tried setting all item upgrade currency to max to see if that would fix it, but it did not.

Here is a picture:

image

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Try to sim a character with a 421 signet of titanic insight and click the + sign.

Expected behavior
To be able to click the + sign and sim a 447 version of the ring.

Link a sim with the problem (if available)

If you have a sim report that shows the problem, please provide the URL here
Have not simmed it yet as I wished to sim the 447 version

Character or /simc input

https://pastebin.com/vrVtjRpq

Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

@wheatbread wheatbread added the bug label Jul 12, 2023
@seriallos
Copy link
Owner

Should be fixed in ~15 minutes or so. Raidbots wasn't properly handling the Aspect Crest -> Enchanted Aspect Crest conversion. Thanks for the report!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants