Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PROPOSAL] Raise USDH - USDC LP Fee #7

Open
dawidsnyders opened this issue Sep 19, 2022 Discussed in #6 · 0 comments
Open

[PROPOSAL] Raise USDH - USDC LP Fee #7

dawidsnyders opened this issue Sep 19, 2022 Discussed in #6 · 0 comments

Comments

@dawidsnyders
Copy link

Summary

This is a proposal from the Hubble Protocol team to raise the Saber USDH - USDC LP Fee from 0.001% (0.1bp) to 0.04% (4bp).

Motivation

The primary reason for doing so is to ensure that the liquidity providers for the pool earns a sustainable yield, so they continue to provide liquidity, and continue to facilitate TVL and volume for Saber.

At present, the USDH - USDC Pool has a $816,343 TVL with $342,808 24h volume, delivering a 0.15339% APY.

This implies a yearly fee income of $1,252 for the entire pool, with a fee set to 0.001%.

Assuming that volume remains consistent after a fee raise, increasing fees by 40x to 0.04 translates to a 6.1356% APY.

A balance needs to be struck between providing a good user experience, and protocol sustainability. Having virtually no fees on a pool may facilitate volume, but ultimately it delivers almost no value to Saber itself, nor to users who provide liquidity to Saber.

Even a trading volume decrease will still leave Saber, and USDH LP providers earning more fees than at present. Saber is a strategic liquidity venue for USDH, and will continue to be incentivized by emissions due to Hubble's SBR treasury votes, in order to continue to boost pool attractiveness & TVL.

Hubble aims to deliver value to USDH holders, and the USDH-USDC Saber Pool is a key area for doing so. Raising the fee will play a significant part in adding value to users, as well as Saber itself.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants
@dawidsnyders and others