From 939efd92944a9e358ecd4d95d50650fa9c011391 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ma=C3=ABlle=20Salmon?= Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 08:35:08 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] fix: remove Twitter link and update Adam's credentials :-) --- softwarereview_reviewer.Rmd | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/softwarereview_reviewer.Rmd b/softwarereview_reviewer.Rmd index b4cfc77b8..051f801c2 100644 --- a/softwarereview_reviewer.Rmd +++ b/softwarereview_reviewer.Rmd @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ First-time reviewers may find it helpful to read (about) some previous reviews. You can read blog posts written by reviewers about their experiences [via this link](https://ropensci.org/tags/reviewer/). In particular, in [this blog post by Mara Averick](https://ropensci.org/blog/2017/08/22/first-package-review/) read about the "naive user" role a reviewer can take to provide useful feedback even without being experts of the package's topic or implementation, by asking themselves *"What did I think this thing would do? Does it do it? What are things that scare me off?"*. In [another blog post](https://ropensci.org/blog/2017/09/08/first-review-experiences/) Verena Haunschmid explains how she alternated between using the package and checking its code. -As both a former reviewer and package author [Adam Sparks](https://adamhsparks.netlify.app/) [wrote this](https://twitter.com/adamhsparks/status/898132036451303425) "\[write\] a good critique of the package structure and best coding practices. If you know how to do something better, tell me. It's easy to miss documentation opportunities as a developer, as a reviewer, you have a different view. You're a user that can give feedback. What's not clear in the package? How can it be made more clear? If you're using it for the first time, is it easy? Do you know another R package that maybe I should be using? Or is there one I'm using that perhaps I shouldn't be? If you can contribute to the package, offer." +As both a former reviewer and package author, and now editor, [Adam Sparks](https://adamhsparks.netlify.app/) wrote "\[write\] a good critique of the package structure and best coding practices. If you know how to do something better, tell me. It's easy to miss documentation opportunities as a developer, as a reviewer, you have a different view. You're a user that can give feedback. What's not clear in the package? How can it be made more clear? If you're using it for the first time, is it easy? Do you know another R package that maybe I should be using? Or is there one I'm using that perhaps I shouldn't be? If you can contribute to the package, offer." ### Helper package for reviewers {#helper-package-for-reviewers}