Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Route incorrect and incomplete with GPX Smart provider #610

Open
jogubo opened this issue Jun 8, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Route incorrect and incomplete with GPX Smart provider #610

jogubo opened this issue Jun 8, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@jogubo
Copy link

jogubo commented Jun 8, 2022

Context

When I create a GPX file with BRouter, and I select GPX Smart for navigation, the route is incorrect and incomplete

Steps to reproduce

  • Create route with BRouter and export it.
  • In Pure Maps, import GPX file and use 'GPX Smart' provider

Example

BRouter
GPX file

@rinigus
Copy link
Owner

rinigus commented Jun 8, 2022

That provider (GPX Smart) requires you to have offline server (OSM Scout Server) working and having maps covering the region of interest. Then, if it is for cycling, corresponding mode has to be selected.

Does GPX provider work?

@jogubo
Copy link
Author

jogubo commented Jun 8, 2022

OSM Scout Server is installed and there are map, bike mode is selected.
GPX Provider works fine

@rinigus
Copy link
Owner

rinigus commented Jun 12, 2022

Looks like BRouter is using https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10863802 and probably similar. OSM Scout Server doesn't use it in its calculations and hence cannot reproduce GPX route as it should through its router. Notice that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52072553 can be used by OSM Scout Server, but that one has bicycle related tag.

So, it is down to the fact that OSM maps are not tagged properly and those tags should be added there. As for end result - incomplete and incorrect route, would have to think how to approach it and show on the map.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants