Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Expected Lifetime to Catalogue Items #393

Merged

Conversation

asuresh-code
Copy link
Contributor

@asuresh-code asuresh-code commented Oct 9, 2024

Description

Enter a description of the changes here

Testing instructions

Add a set up instructions describing how the reviewer should test the code

  • Review code
  • Check Actions build
  • Review changes to test coverage
  • {more steps here}

Agile board tracking

closes #338

@asuresh-code asuresh-code self-assigned this Oct 9, 2024
@asuresh-code asuresh-code marked this pull request as draft October 9, 2024 15:53
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.87%. Comparing base (6090589) to head (39dec34).
Report is 18 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #393   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    97.86%   97.87%           
========================================
  Files           41       41           
  Lines         1502     1504    +2     
========================================
+ Hits          1470     1472    +2     
  Misses          32       32           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@asuresh-code asuresh-code marked this pull request as ready for review October 16, 2024 16:06
Copy link
Collaborator

@joelvdavies joelvdavies left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The migration script doesn't seem to work on the mock data, I get several
image errors.

Copy link
Collaborator

@joelvdavies joelvdavies left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just two comments, script worked well for me 🥳

Copy link
Collaborator

@joelvdavies joelvdavies left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@VKTB VKTB left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉 Thank you for your work!

Copy link
Collaborator

@joelvdavies joelvdavies left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This can be safely merged prior to ral-facilities/inventory-management-system#1020 if you wish. The extra field will just be ignored.

@asuresh-code asuresh-code merged commit 5931ed9 into develop Oct 18, 2024
8 checks passed
@asuresh-code asuresh-code deleted the add-expected-lifetime-field-to-cataolgue-items-#338 branch October 18, 2024 15:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add expected lifetime field to catalogue items
3 participants