You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi!
Tested in ubuntu 16.04, 64bit.
I use the following command with the file:
./imgdataopt imgdataopt_crash test.png
and get the error:
Segmentation fault
I use valgrind to analysis the bug and get the below information:
valgrind imgdataopt imgdataopt_crash test.png
==29579== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==29579== Copyright (C) 2002-2015, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==29579== Using Valgrind-3.11.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==29579== Command: ./imgdataopt imgdataopt_crash test.png
==29579==
warning: png image data too short
==29579== Invalid write of size 8
==29579== at 0x4C3453F: memset (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==29579== by 0x42FBCE: ??? (in imgdataopt)
==29579== by 0x402D58: ??? (in imgdataopt)
==29579== by 0x4E5A82F: (below main) (libc-start.c:291)
==29579== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==29579==
==29579==
==29579== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
==29579== Access not within mapped region at address 0x0
==29579== at 0x4C3453F: memset (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==29579== by 0x42FBCE: ??? (in imgdataopt)
==29579== by 0x402D58: ??? (in imgdataopt)
==29579== by 0x4E5A82F: (below main) (libc-start.c:291)
==29579== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
==29579== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
==29579== possible), you can try to increase the size of the
==29579== main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
==29579== The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
==29579==
==29579== HEAP SUMMARY:
==29579== in use at exit: 1,597 bytes in 3 blocks
==29579== total heap usage: 4 allocs, 1 frees, 5,693 bytes allocated
==29579==
==29579== LEAK SUMMARY:
==29579== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==29579== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==29579== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==29579== still reachable: 1,597 bytes in 3 blocks
==29579== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==29579== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==29579==
==29579== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==29579== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
I use AddressSanitizer to build imgdataopt, this file can cause SEGV signal with the following command:
./imgdataopt imgdataopt_crash test.png
This is the ASAN information:
warning: png image data too short
=================================================================
==29582==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: unknown-crash on address 0x0000ffffffff at pc 0x7fd44c1ddbec bp 0x7ffed7d51c30 sp 0x7ffed7d513d8
WRITE of size 4294967295 at 0x0000ffffffff thread T0
#0 0x7fd44c1ddbeb in __asan_memset (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.2+0x8cbeb)
#1 0x40c7c4 (imgdataopt/imgdataopt+0x40c7c4)
#2 0x401bc3 (imgdataopt/imgdataopt+0x401bc3)
#3 0x7fd44bda782f in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2082f)
#4 0x4032d8 (imgdataopt/imgdataopt+0x4032d8)
Address 0x0000ffffffff is located in the shadow gap area.
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: unknown-crash ??:0 __asan_memset
==29582==ABORTING
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi!
Tested in ubuntu 16.04, 64bit.
I use the following command with the file:
and get the error:
I use valgrind to analysis the bug and get the below information:
I use AddressSanitizer to build imgdataopt, this file can cause SEGV signal with the following command:
This is the ASAN information:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: