We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
module
let in / where
I think that it is possible to think of let in / where as an anonymous module, that is immediately exposed to local scope and vice versa.
Thus one of them can be replaced with the other.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes
x = foo = 1 bar = 2
(foo = 1, bar = 2) is anonymous record but with in
(foo = 1, bar = 2)
in
x = foo = 1 bar = 2 in foo + bar
this record is exposed to foo + bar expression.
foo + bar
Sorry, something went wrong.
Refactor - Lenses for Ann in Oczor.Syntax.Types ptol#3
Ann
9416061
Refactor - Lenses for Ann in Oczor.Syntax.Types (#16)
93ff9ca
* Refactor - Lenses for `Ann` in Oczor.Syntax.Types * Refactor - Lenses for `Ann` in Oczor.Syntax.Types #2 * Refactor - Lenses for `Ann` in Oczor.Syntax.Types #3 * Fix * Fix #2 * Apply patch
No branches or pull requests
I think that it is possible to think of
let in / where
as an anonymous module, that is immediately exposed to local scope and vice versa.Thus one of them can be replaced with the other.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: