Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explicit License? #39

Open
Sp0ng3b0b opened this issue Oct 2, 2013 · 4 comments
Open

Explicit License? #39

Sp0ng3b0b opened this issue Oct 2, 2013 · 4 comments

Comments

@Sp0ng3b0b
Copy link

Hello,

I've looked on your website and in the readme, it says its free, but does it have a certain license? Like MIT or GPL? Am i allowed to use this in Commercial applications?

I like your plugin very much - much internetz to you sir!

Greetz

@prashantchaudhary
Copy link
Owner

Glad you liked it! Not sure how the licensing thing works but I can assure you it's free for all kind of use. If you call that sort of licenses a MIT, then be it MIT!

On 02-Oct-2013, at 7:04 pm, Sp0ng3b0b [email protected] wrote:

Hello,

I've looked on your website and in the readme, it says its free, but does it have a certain license? Like MIT or GPL? Am i allowed to use this in Commercial applications?

I like your plugin very much - much internetz to you sir!

Greetz


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@stevethimmesch
Copy link

Hello,

Our software shop is strict about using explicit and appropriate licenses. I would really like to use your plugin but before I can I need an explicit license set in the source (readme.txt). The MIT license would be great. Another option that is any looser would be: the WTFPL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL

If this is something that could be added to the readme file that would help me out a ton and potentially help others in similar positions.

Thanks so much for your work!

@prashantchaudhary
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for writing Steve! I'm not in state to make the change and push to readme file, but if it helps then I authorise you to use this plugin for all commercial and personal uses for free. Please continue using this plugin, and I will update the readme file soon.
Bye I didn't know there was such a license - "do what the fuck you want to public license"!

Thanks
Prashant

On 15-Nov-2013, at 2:50 am, stevethimmesch [email protected] wrote:

Hello,

Our software shop is strict about using explicit and appropriate licenses. I would really like to use your plugin but before I can I need an explicit license set in the source (readme.txt). The MIT license would be great. Another option that is any looser would be: the WTFPL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL

If this is something that could be added to the readme file that would help me out a ton and potentially help others in similar positions.

Thanks so much for your work!


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

bradberger pushed a commit to jsmodules/ddslick that referenced this issue Dec 9, 2015
Based on [the conversation here](prashantchaudhary/ddslick#39) this is adding a license, since it's clear the project's original author has given full permissions for any kind of use.
@karnivas
Copy link

karnivas commented Apr 5, 2016

Hi Prashant Chaudhary,

Would you allow us to make use of prashantchaudhary-ddslick under the terms of the MIT license?
https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT

If you can reply/answer it will be great for us to close the query raised and help us in using this.

-Srini

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants