Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Funny Leiden+ saving behaviour #98

Closed
jcowey opened this issue Nov 10, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Funny Leiden+ saving behaviour #98

jcowey opened this issue Nov 10, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@jcowey
Copy link
Member

jcowey commented Nov 10, 2017

I suspect this may have something to do with pre-processing.

The file I will discuss is in finalization and I will not finalize it until the problem has been diagnosed sufficiently to get rid of the behaviour.

http://papyri.info/editor/publications/61998/ddb_identifiers/139425/preview

In line FrB 4 you see

bildschirmfoto 2017-11-10 um 16 00 58

in XML this looks like

<unclear>Η</unclear><hi rend="supraline">̔́ρωνί</hi>

If I correct the XML to

<hi rend="supraline"><unclear>Ἥ</unclear>ρωνί</hi>

and save the file and look at preview I see presented

bildschirmfoto 2017-11-10 um 15 52 59

which is what I want to see.

If I now return to Leiden+ I see

bildschirmfoto 2017-11-10 um 15 54 23

which looks good. If I now save that file it looks fine in Leiden+

bildschirmfoto 2017-11-10 um 15 56 31

but it once again is presented in ugly fashion

bildschirmfoto 2017-11-10 um 15 57 41

and the XML has gone back to being ugly

bildschirmfoto 2017-11-10 um 15 58 30

and incorrect.

It would be nice to have this fixed. Not top priority, but I wanted to capture the behaviour.
I can, of course, correct in the XML before finalizing and then everything will be fine.

@ryanfb
Copy link
Member

ryanfb commented Nov 10, 2017

This seems like another good testcase for papyri/xsugar#10: papyri/xsugar#10

@ryanfb
Copy link
Member

ryanfb commented Feb 24, 2021

Closing as duplicate of papyri/xsugar#10.

@ryanfb ryanfb closed this as completed Feb 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants