Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch CI to GitHub actions #522

Open
codefromthecrypt opened this issue Nov 26, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Switch CI to GitHub actions #522

codefromthecrypt opened this issue Nov 26, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Member

travis-ci.org is being shut down the end of the year. We tried switching to travis-ci.com, but shortly ran out of quota. For the last two weeks we have not succeeded in getting classified as OSS or even a temporary quota increase. In response to this, all the other projects have moved, or are in the process of moving to GitHub Actions.

While at it, we are standardizing build script and job names for easy reference when people switch from one project to another. It is important that the tasks done in CI do not heavily rely on CI specific tools as in the future we may get into trouble like this again. For example, in the past we had to switch from travis to circle back to travis. Using scripts we control as entrypoints gives us flexibility as CI providers change their policies around open source communities.

Here is an example that follows conventions and might be helpful here: openzipkin/zipkin-ruby#180

@jcchavezs
Copy link
Contributor

jcchavezs commented Dec 16, 2020

Pinging @peter279k as he helped a lot with other migrations around zipkin <3

@jcchavezs
Copy link
Contributor

@peter279k did you have time to jump into this?

@peter279k
Copy link

Sorry. I have no available time to work on that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants