test: add test to useParagonTheme hook and paragon utils

[dcoa]

Description:

This is a testing contribution to Theming Configuration in Runtime, covering useParagonTheme hook, and the utils file.

Context: #440

C.C @adamstankiewicz

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @dcoa! Please note that it may take us up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

Feel free to add as much of the following information to the ticket as you can:

• supporting documentation
• Open edX discussion forum threads
• timeline information ("this must be merged by XX date", and why that is)
• partner information ("this is a course on edx.org")
• any other information that can help Product understand the context for the PR

All technical communication about the code itself will be done via the GitHub pull request interface. As a reminder, our process documentation is here.

Please let us know once your PR is ready for our review and all tests are green.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +3.40% 🎉

Comparison is base (cf10278) 79.05% compared to head (2303087) 82.45%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                   Coverage Diff                    @@
##           ags/inject-theme-css     #525      +/-   ##
========================================================
+ Coverage                 79.05%   82.45%   +3.40%     
========================================================
  Files                        48       48              
  Lines                      1351     1351              
  Branches                    283      283              
========================================================
+ Hits                       1068     1114      +46     
+ Misses                      251      217      -34     
+ Partials                     32       20      -12     

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mphilbrick211]

Hi @dcoa - is this ready for review?

cc: @adamstankiewicz

[dcoa]

Hi @mphilbrick211, yes, it is

[mphilbrick211]

Hi @openedx/fed-bom! Would someone be able to review / merge this for us?

[adamstankiewicz]

Looks like the version in this href URL is incorrectly formatted, i.e. $2.0.0Version.

[dcoa]

Yes, I fixed it, thanks

[dcoa]

Hi, @adamstankiewicz, any additional feedback?

[mphilbrick211]

Hi, @adamstankiewicz, any additional feedback?

Hi @adamstankiewicz! Friendly ping on this.

[mphilbrick211]

Hi @openedx/fed-bom @adamstankiewicz! Is this something you could please review / merge for us? Thanks!

[jmbowman]

Some context for FED-BOM from @adamstankiewicz :

This is adding test coverage for this open PR, related to the Paragon design tokens work: #440

As the owners of frontend-platform, would love FED-BOMs review on both, about the specific implementation but also the high level approach! It's been awhile since these PRs have been touched, though, and need additional QA... It's related to the design tokens project the Raccoon Gang Paragon engineers have been working on in the background for awhile now. The frontend-platform changes are the proposed mechanism to load the external Paragon theme CSS generated by the design tokens project, hosted from a CDN url.

I believe the changes are additive-only, where this frontend-platform PR and the associated frontend-build PR could be released to master without a breaking change.

[adamstankiewicz]

Thanks for the contribution, @dcoa! Apologies for the delayed review.

[openedx-webhooks]

@dcoa 🎉 Your pull request was merged! Please take a moment to answer a two question survey so we can improve your experience in the future.